"Is" versus "Contains" in a Knack Database App

Is vs Contains

As a developer navigating through the intricacies of organizing and filtering data, I often encounter nuances that seem trivial but can lead to significant hiccups if overlooked. Today, I want to delve into a distinction that might appear straightforward but has tripped up many of us in the field: the difference between "is" and "contains" when filtering user roles.

Setting the Scene: Challenges of Remote Work

Picture this: I find myself once again on the road, amidst less-than-ideal conditions for a video session. The lighting is poor, and background noise—from birds chirping to enthusiastic Latin American renditions of 80s classics—threatens to drown out my voice. But despite the distractions, I'm here to shed light on a crucial topic in software development.

Is vs Contains: A Tale of Two Operators

In the realm of filtering data, whether you're working on the frontend or backend, operators like "is" and "contains" play a vital role. Typically, "is" checks for exact matches, while "contains" looks for partial matches within a set of data. Seems simple enough, right?

The Pitfall: User Roles and Filtering

Here's where things get interesting—and where many developers stumble. Consider a scenario where users can have multiple roles assigned to them. This is common in applications that need to manage various levels of access and permissions.

The Problem Unveiled: Page Rules and User Roles

Let's say I'm implementing page rules based on user roles. If I use "is" to check for a specific role, such as "admin," it will only match users who have that role exclusively. However, if a user has multiple roles, using "is" will fail because it expects an exact match with the entire set of roles. This is where "contains" becomes crucial.

Why "Contains" Matters

Using "contains" allows us to search within a list of roles and find any matches. So, if a user has roles like "admin" and "user," a "contains" operation looking for "admin" will correctly identify that user, even though they also have other roles.

Practical Implications and Lessons Learned

I've seen this issue cause confusion and frustration, especially as applications evolve and user roles become more complex. Initially, using "is" might seem to work fine, but as soon as your application grows and users accumulate multiple roles, problems arise.

Conclusion: Stay Vigilant

In conclusion, while the distinction between "is" and "contains" may seem like a minor detail, its impact on filtering logic can be profound. Always consider the context in which you're filtering data, especially when dealing with dynamic user roles. By using "contains" appropriately, you ensure that your filtering logic remains robust and adaptable as your application scales.

Final Thoughts

So, the next time you find yourself implementing filtering mechanisms in your code, remember this lesson. It might just save you from scratching your head in confusion, as I did when I first encountered this issue. Until next time, happy building, and may your filters always find what you seek.

Interested in my Knack database services? ... Book a call with me here: https://calendly.com/daveparrish/callwithdave